
Re: R > oo
Posted:
Mar 3, 2013 8:27 PM


On Mar 4, 11:00 am, Rupert <rupertmccal...@yahoo.com> wrote: > On Saturday, March 2, 2013 9:30:47 PM UTC+1, Graham Cooper wrote: > > On Mar 2, 7:28 pm, Rupert <rupertmccal...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On Friday, March 1, 2013 9:39:31 PM UTC+1, Graham Cooper wrote: > > > > > A LIST oo ROWS LONG! > > > > > 0.00... > > > > > 0.00... > > > > This post is incoherent dribble. > > > I showed a partial infinite list of reals. > > > 0.00.. > > > 0;00.. > > > .. > > > Do you have an ANTIDIAGONAL function to support your claims it is > > > incomplete? > > > What is your antidiagonal function? > > > Herc > > Do you not know how to construct the antidiagonal given any list of reals?
Not with a halting Turing Machine no!
Herc  www.BLoCKHeADS.com

