Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum


Math Forum
 Ask Dr. Math
 Discussions
 Internet Newsletter
 MathTools
 Problems of the Week
 Teacher2Teacher
 Teacher Exchange
 Workshops

Search All of the Math Forum:
Browse our Internet Mathematics Library

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: How can NO LOGICIAN follow this argument??
Replies: 13   Last Post: Mar 5, 2013 11:06 AM

Advanced Search
Reply to this Topic Reply to this Topic

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Graham Cooper

Posts: 4,063
Registered: 5/20/10
Re: How can NO LOGICIAN follow this argument??
Posted: Mar 4, 2013 1:28 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Mar 4, 6:32 pm, Rupert <rupertmccal...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Monday, March 4, 2013 8:44:45 AM UTC+1, Graham Cooper wrote:
> > On Mar 4, 2:20 pm, George Greene <gree...@email.unc.edu> wrote:
>
> > > On Mar 3, 1:54 pm, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Then WHY cannot you spot the FLAW that I have EXPLICITLY POINTED OUT?
>
> > > Since there are no flaws
>
> > BZZZZZT!
>
> > "We can construct a formula"
>
> >      /\
>
> >      ||
>
> >      \/
>
> >  "We can construct *ANY* formula"
>
> > Can you construct ANY Formula (as a Theorem) in ZFC?
>
> > Herc
>
> No.
>
> I have no idea why you think that this has anything to do with the arguments from Daryl and Jesse that you are quoting.

Do you know what an equivalence symbol looks like?


Herc

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2013. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.