
Re: How can NO LOGICIAN follow this argument??
Posted:
Mar 4, 2013 1:28 PM


On Mar 4, 6:32 pm, Rupert <rupertmccal...@yahoo.com> wrote: > On Monday, March 4, 2013 8:44:45 AM UTC+1, Graham Cooper wrote: > > On Mar 4, 2:20 pm, George Greene <gree...@email.unc.edu> wrote: > > > > On Mar 3, 1:54 pm, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Then WHY cannot you spot the FLAW that I have EXPLICITLY POINTED OUT? > > > > Since there are no flaws > > > BZZZZZT! > > > "We can construct a formula" > > > /\ > > >  > > > \/ > > > "We can construct *ANY* formula" > > > Can you construct ANY Formula (as a Theorem) in ZFC? > > > Herc > > No. > > I have no idea why you think that this has anything to do with the arguments from Daryl and Jesse that you are quoting.
Do you know what an equivalence symbol looks like?
Herc

