The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Software » comp.soft-sys.matlab

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Best way to "classify" a vector? ("averaging" subsampling)
Replies: 4   Last Post: Mar 5, 2013 6:05 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 2,359
Registered: 12/6/04
Re: Best way to "classify" a vector? ("averaging" subsampling)
Posted: Mar 4, 2013 4:30 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

"Luca " <l.presottoRE@MOVE.campus.unimib.NOTit> wrote in message <kh334d$k8h$>...
> Hi everyone.
> Let's suppose to have these two vectors:
> t=0:0.01:1000; %timestamps
> val = rand(size(t)); %value associated with each timestamp
> Now let's suppose I want to calculate the mean value of val in each interval of "t" broad "1".
> What would be the best way to do it?
> The dumbest would be something _like_ (I'm sure somebody will find a couple of minor errors :-). But try to get the point!):
> t2 = ceil (t);
> [t2,I]= unique (t2,'first');
> [t2,J]=unique (t2,'last');
> meanVal= zeros(max(t2(:),1);
> for i=1:numel(meanVal)
> meanVal(i) = mean(val(I(i):val(J(i));
> end
> Now... I know that matlab always has some built in functions that does all of these basic operations better and faster.
> So.... what would be a smarter way to do this??

% This sounds like you are trying to compute a "running average" of the vector.
% If so, see the Examples section of

doc filter

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.