On Mar 5, 10:57 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > On 4 Mrz., 23:56, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Let K be a (possibly potentially infinite) set of > > lines of L. Then > > > Every FISON of d is in a findable line of K > > iff K does not have a findable last line > > No, false quote.
What do you think this was a quote of? This is my claim, put into the language we have now developed.
>Every findable FIS of d is in a findable line of L
Clearly, The question is: "For what subsets of lines of L is this still true?" Hence the condition on K
<snip> > > > WM's claim: silly > > Only for those who deny the possibility of identity for potentially > infinite sets.
The claim the unfindable, variable, different for each person l_m is "one single line" of L is still silly even if you allow identity for potentially infinite sets.
