Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: application of weights
Replies: 1   Last Post: Mar 5, 2013 2:24 PM

 Richard Ulrich Posts: 2,961 Registered: 12/13/04
Re: application of weights
Posted: Mar 5, 2013 2:24 PM

On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 22:24:19 -0800 (PST), Usman Khan
<usman.cs@gmail.com> wrote:

>Question:
>How should I apply the weights where I have a survey of households and
>
>- I am picking one child out of a household that has both parents living together...
>
>My data looks like this
>
>1 Self 50 M
>1 Wife 49 F
>1 son 10 M
>1 son 8 M
>1 daughter 2 F
>
>2 Self 50 M
>2 Wife 49 F
>2 daughter 12 F
>
>3 Self 50 M
>3 Wife 49 F
>3 son 15 M
>
>4 Self 50 M
>4 Wife 49 F
>
>
>Household Weights are
>1 5
>2 10
>3 10
>4 5
>
>
>now if I were to look at the % Children in households with two parents, would it be
>
> hh_1, hh_2, hh_3 / hh_1, hh_2,hh_3,hh_4 = 5+10+10 / 5+10+10+5
>
>The problem with the above solution is that the weights are for households and not for individual members. Is it fair to use weights in this case?
>

I don't know where you get your weights or why you want to use them.

The only problem that I see with your formula, assuming you like
the weights, is that you have assigned a label that does not
parse properly in English.

The fraction that you compute should be called something like,
"Percent of households that have (one or more) children."

If you want to say something about "individual members" rather
than households, ... Are you referring to only children as
"members"? So, do you want to compute what your label
says, "% children in households with two parents" -- as a
contrast to 0 or 1 parent?

If so -- Your numerator will be a (weighted?) count of children,
and the denominator denominator will be a (weighed?) count
of households that do have one or more child. In your
example, that sum would omit household 4.

--
Rich Ulrich