On 6 Mrz., 12:05, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > L_m is a single line if m is a natural number. > > Would you prefer to call L_m infinitely many lines? > > Nope, I would prefer to call L_m a function > (of time and person). A function may have as > value a "single line of the list" > but calling something that changes a "single line of the > list" is silly.-
I said always that L_m is a function (of several arguments) and that this function takes as vaules lines of the list. As it takes single lines, I don't see why we should not call them single lines. But that is only a quarrel about word. Nevertheless, you have not yet answered the more important question. Is there a particular reason? Remember, not long ago you claimed that potential infinity as well as actual infinity would yield the same results.
