
Re: R > oo
Posted:
Mar 7, 2013 3:06 AM


On Mar 3, 12:01 am, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Since all above arguments must hold, the latter more absurd ones are > enough to throw doubt on Cantors Method
Well, we finally find out why GC is posting all these lists. However, the argument does not make sense. It is true that at one point the Cantor proof requires the choice of an antidiagonal function. There are many such functions that can be chosen, each leading to a different number which is not on the list. For some reason this is a problem in GC 's mind. But why should an arbitrary choice invalidate the proof. We only need that there is at least one antidiagonal function, so the fact that there is more than one is of no consequence.

