On 6 Mrz., 23:48, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 6, 7:44 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > > On 6 Mrz., 13:18, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > > <snip> > > > > A subset K of the lines of L > > > contains every FIS of d iff > > > K has no findable last line. > > > No > > Let G be a subset of the lines of L > with a findable last line. Call > this line g. > > Do you agree with the statement > > It is not true that every FIS of d > is contained in g. > ?
I agree with the statements: In potential infinity any set is finite, though not constant. In actual infinite, there are sets that have more than any finite number of elements.
This is a difference, well-known to the experts, in particular Cantor and Hilbert. Therefore every attempt of WH to veil this unbridgeable gap is condemned to fail. Your claim that actual and potential infinity do not differe is simply silly as are your attempts to "prove" this claim. Try to invent the perpetuum mobile. The odds are much higher there.
PS: Every findable FIS of d is contained in a findable line of (L_m) = L.