In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, William Hughes <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Mar 7, 9:39 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > > > To talk of d without further specification is silly. > > > WM: There does not exist > (in the sense of not findable) > a natural number m such that > the mth line of L is coFIS with > d > > No mention of the state of d. So I guess > we can talk of whether d is coFIS with > a line without mentioning > the state of d. > > Do you agree with the statement > > g is not coFIS with d. > > ?
If it makes sense outside of Wolkenmuekenheim, WM will not agree with it. --