The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Anti-foundation axiom
Replies: 11   Last Post: Mar 15, 2013 6:00 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Frederick Williams

Posts: 2,164
Registered: 10/4/10
Re: Anti-foundation axiom
Posted: Mar 9, 2013 6:19 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Charlie-Boo wrote:

> You can't really have axioms for set theory. Axioms are a way to
> formalize our understanding of a subject e.g. number theory or
> geometry. They are so well developed and understood that we try to
> codify our great understanding with a formal system.
> But how well do we understand sets? There are a dozen versions of set
> theory. You end up with conflicting theorems from one system to
> another!! Can you imagine 2 different versions of Geometry or Number
> Theory? At most one would be right.

I like you Charlie. I often think I'm the dimmest poster to sci.logic
and sci.math and it's a bit embarrassing. But then you come along...
thanks pal!

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by
this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him.
Jonathan Swift: Thoughts on Various Subjects, Moral and Diverting

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.