Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Simple analytical properties of n/d
Replies: 20   Last Post: Mar 11, 2013 11:01 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
William Elliot

Posts: 1,484
Registered: 1/8/12
Re: Simple analytical properties of n/d
Posted: Mar 9, 2013 9:28 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Sat, 9 Mar 2013, Ross A. Finlayson wrote:
> On Mar 8, 9:31 pm, William Elliot <ma...@panix.com> wrote:

> > What's R_[0,1]?  So now your considering any function f:N -> [0,1]
> > and want to discuss rang f.
> >

> > > Obviously and directly as N is countable, ran(f)
> > > is countable,
> > > Is ran(f) = [0,1]?

> >
> > Of course not, you showed that range f is countable and
> > unable to be any uncountable set.

>
> Apply the antidiagonal argument to ran(f).


Why?

> the only item different from each is and, ran(f) includes 1.0.

Huh?

> Apply the nested intervals argument to ran(f).

What's that?

> The interval is [.0, .1], there's no missing element from ran(f)'s
> [0,1].
>
> The antidiagonal argument and nested intervals argument don't support
> that ran(f) =/= [0,1].
>
> In fact, remarkable among functions N -> R, is that the antidiagonal
> argument and nested intervals argument, DON'T apply to f.


It doesn't? What if f:N -> [0,1] is the constant function f(N) = {0}?



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.