On Mar 12, 11:44 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > On 12 Mrz., 11:08, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:> On Mar 12, 10:19 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > > > On 12 Mrz., 00:51, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > <snip> > > > > > There is a fixed column, C_1, which is coFIS to > > > > |N. There is no fixed line which is coFIS to |N > > > > There is no |N in potential infinity. > > > |N is the potentially infinite set of natural numbers. > > The "potentially infinite set" is already a contradictio in adjecto, > because the notion of set always requires completenes.
OK, let |N be the potentially infinite sequence of natural numbers.
> Actual infinity requires that *all* natural numbers are in the list > but not in a single line. That is a contradiction.
OK, your position is that the equivalent statement in potential infinity
Every natural number is in the list but not in a single findable line.
is not a contradiction. Even if I accept this all it means is that I am incorrectly talking about numbers in infinite sets, rather than findable numbers in finite sets with unfindable last elements. My results do not change.
All you have is a teddy bear that says "An infinite set of natural numbers does not exist".