as Stevin explained, it's just a simple ambiguity, that is "taken care of with an equals sign."
1.0000... means, "one dot endless place-holders for powers of tenth;" you have got to visualize every "last" one of them.
> yesw but .9999... is a non-finite number > and 1.0000.. is a finite number
thus: he just never learned fractions; that simple, is that he cannot possibly "analyze the dimensionality of a problem," if he cannot ... cancel units in a simple fraction.
also, this equation looks as if it has a "function of m," although I don't recall, what he really thinks he means.
the speed of light is in (say) meters per second; the growth of the wavefront is in skware meters per skware seconds, but that is two very differnt kind of "skwares" ... really, the Pythagorean theorem has *nothing* to do with skwares!
> > KE = a/g (m) + v/32.174 (m). > > And the correct equation for the acceleration > > due to gravity is g = 32.174 feet per second EACH second,
thus: because you refuse to consider "atoms in free space," I had to stop rolling aorund on the floor to consider, Why the ****?
> # I'd claim that there is only one, authentic, presentation > of the elements, and that is the "short" version, > where Groups have A and B, plus the > Lanthanides and Actinides restored to the body > of the table. Messy, but > accurate - and reflecting the Evolution of the Elements.
thus: the orbits of the electrons in the fly-away astronaut cannot go faster than the speed of light propogation (Snell's law of refraction, taken to extremus) "in the forward direction."
what is so difficult?... of course, the orbits are not in general aligned with or against the direction of travel ... oh, no -- trigonometry!