Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: 0.9999... = 1 that means mathematics ends in contradiction
Replies: 53   Last Post: Mar 18, 2013 9:33 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Brian Q. Hutchings Posts: 6,427 Registered: 12/6/04
Re: 0.9999... = 1 that means mathematics ends in contradiction
Posted: Mar 12, 2013 9:06 PM

as Stevin explained,
it's just a simple ambiguity,
that is "taken care of with an equals sign."

1.0000... means, "one dot endless place-holders
for powers of tenth;" you have got to visualize every "last" one
of them.

> yesw but .9999... is a non-finite number
> and 1.0000.. is a finite number

thus:
he just never learned fractions; that simple, is
that he cannot possibly "analyze the dimensionality
of a problem," if he cannot ... cancel units in a simple fraction.

also, this equation looks as if it has a "function of m,"
although I don't recall, what he really thinks he means.

the speed of light is in (say) meters per second;
the growth of the wavefront is in skware meters per skware seconds,
but that is two very differnt kind of "skwares" ... really,
the Pythagorean theorem has *nothing* to do with skwares!

> > KE = a/g (m) + v/32.174 (m).
> > And the correct equation for the acceleration
> > due to gravity is g = 32.174 feet per second EACH second,

thus:
because you refuse to consider "atoms in free space," I had
to stop rolling aorund on the floor to consider, Why the ****?

thus:
the elements (and isotopes) cannot be understood
without reference to the regular hedra;
see the Moon model,
http://21stcenturysciencetech.com

> # I'd claim that there is only one, authentic, presentation
> of the elements, and that is the "short" version,
> where Groups have A and B, plus the
> Lanthanides and Actinides restored to the body
> of the table. Messy, but
> accurate - and reflecting the Evolution of the Elements.

thus:
the orbits of the electrons in the fly-away astronaut cannot
go faster than the speed of light propogation (Snell's law
of refraction, taken to extremus) "in the forward direction."

what is so difficult?... of course,
the orbits are not in general aligned with or against
the direction of travel ... oh, no -- trigonometry!

Date Subject Author
3/8/13 byron
3/9/13 bacle
3/9/13 Pfsszxt@aol.com
3/12/13 Brian Q. Hutchings
3/12/13 byron
3/12/13 Brian Q. Hutchings
3/12/13 byron
3/12/13 Virgil
3/13/13 YBM
3/13/13 JT
3/13/13 Brian Q. Hutchings
3/14/13 JT
3/14/13 Brian Q. Hutchings
3/12/13 bacle
3/12/13 Virgil
3/13/13 fom
3/13/13 JT
3/13/13 JT
3/13/13 JT
3/13/13 fom
3/13/13 JT
3/13/13 JT
3/13/13 JT
3/13/13 JT
3/13/13 JT
3/13/13 fom
3/14/13 JT
3/14/13 fom
3/14/13 Brian Q. Hutchings
3/14/13 JT
3/14/13 JT
3/13/13 fom
3/13/13 JT
3/16/13 byron
3/16/13 JT
3/13/13 JT
3/14/13 Transfer Principle
3/15/13 JT
3/15/13 JT
3/15/13 JT
3/15/13 JT
3/15/13 JT
3/18/13 Brian Q. Hutchings
3/14/13 JT
3/14/13 fom
3/14/13 Brian Q. Hutchings
3/14/13 Brian Q. Hutchings
3/13/13 fom
3/13/13 JT
3/13/13 fom
3/13/13 JT
3/9/13 J. Antonio Perez M.
3/13/13 JT
3/15/13 harold james