Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: 0.9999... = 1 that means mathematics ends in contradiction
Replies: 53   Last Post: Mar 18, 2013 9:33 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 byron Posts: 891 Registered: 3/3/09
Re: 0.9999... = 1 that means mathematics ends in contradiction
Posted: Mar 12, 2013 9:39 PM

On Wednesday, March 13, 2013 12:06:53 PM UTC+11, 1treePetrifiedForestLane wrote:
> as Stevin explained,
>
> it's just a simple ambiguity,
>
> that is "taken care of with an equals sign."
>
>
>
> 1.0000... means, "one dot endless place-holders
>
> for powers of tenth;" you have got to visualize every "last" one
>
> of them.
>
>
>

> > yesw but .9999... is a non-finite number
>
> > and 1.0000.. is a finite number
>
>
>
> thus:
>
> he just never learned fractions; that simple, is
>
> that he cannot possibly "analyze the dimensionality
>
> of a problem," if he cannot ... cancel units in a simple fraction.
>
>
>
> also, this equation looks as if it has a "function of m,"
>
> although I don't recall, what he really thinks he means.
>
>
>
> the speed of light is in (say) meters per second;
>
> the growth of the wavefront is in skware meters per skware seconds,
>
> but that is two very differnt kind of "skwares" ... really,
>
> the Pythagorean theorem has *nothing* to do with skwares!
>
>
>

> > > KE = a/g (m) + v/32.174 (m).
>
> > > And the correct equation for the acceleration
>
> > > due to gravity is g = 32.174 feet per second EACH second,
>
>
>
> thus:
>
> because you refuse to consider "atoms in free space," I had
>
> to stop rolling aorund on the floor to consider, Why the ****?
>
>
>
> thus:
>
> the elements (and isotopes) cannot be understood
>
> without reference to the regular hedra;
>
> see the Moon model,
>
> http://21stcenturysciencetech.com
>
>
>

> > # I'd claim that there is only one, authentic, presentation
>
> > of the elements, and that is the "short" version,
>
> > where Groups have A and B, plus the
>
> > Lanthanides and Actinides restored to the body
>
> > of the table. Messy, but
>
> > accurate - and reflecting the Evolution of the Elements.
>
>
>
> thus:
>
> the orbits of the electrons in the fly-away astronaut cannot
>
> go faster than the speed of light propogation (Snell's law
>
> of refraction, taken to extremus) "in the forward direction."
>
>
>
> what is so difficult?... of course,
>
> the orbits are not in general aligned with or against
>
> the direction of travel ... oh, no -- trigonometry!

you say
"as Stevin explained,"

it very simple really
as the proof shows

a non-finite number.9999...= a finite number 1.0000
fact is
.9999... is a non-finite number
and 1.0000.. is a finite number

Date Subject Author
3/8/13 byron
3/9/13 bacle
3/9/13 Pfsszxt@aol.com
3/12/13 Brian Q. Hutchings
3/12/13 byron
3/12/13 Brian Q. Hutchings
3/12/13 byron
3/12/13 Virgil
3/13/13 YBM
3/13/13 JT
3/13/13 Brian Q. Hutchings
3/14/13 JT
3/14/13 Brian Q. Hutchings
3/12/13 bacle
3/12/13 Virgil
3/13/13 fom
3/13/13 JT
3/13/13 JT
3/13/13 JT
3/13/13 fom
3/13/13 JT
3/13/13 JT
3/13/13 JT
3/13/13 JT
3/13/13 JT
3/13/13 fom
3/14/13 JT
3/14/13 fom
3/14/13 Brian Q. Hutchings
3/14/13 JT
3/14/13 JT
3/13/13 fom
3/13/13 JT
3/16/13 byron
3/16/13 JT
3/13/13 JT
3/14/13 Transfer Principle
3/15/13 JT
3/15/13 JT
3/15/13 JT
3/15/13 JT
3/15/13 JT
3/18/13 Brian Q. Hutchings
3/14/13 JT
3/14/13 fom
3/14/13 Brian Q. Hutchings
3/14/13 Brian Q. Hutchings
3/13/13 fom
3/13/13 JT
3/13/13 fom
3/13/13 JT
3/9/13 J. Antonio Perez M.
3/13/13 JT
3/15/13 harold james