The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Probabilities not in [0,1]?
Replies: 8   Last Post: Mar 12, 2013 10:56 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 2,720
Registered: 2/15/09
Re: Probabilities not in [0,1]?
Posted: Mar 12, 2013 10:56 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Mar 12, 4:50 pm, FredJeffries <> wrote:
> On Mar 10, 11:36 am, "Peter Percival" <>
> wrote:

> > Is there a theory of probability in which probabilities do not lie in the
> > real interval [0,1]?


> > More specifically, is there one in which the "space"
> > of probabilities may have points x, y, z with x < y, x < z but y and z not
> > necessarily comparable?

> Not sure what you mean by "not necessarily comparable", but in the
> system of smooth infinitesimal analysis we have that if y and z differ
> by an infinitesimal then the order relation does not satisfy the
> trichotomy law:
> (y < z)  OR (y < z) OR (y = z)

If the infinitesimals of SIA haven't trichotomy, is there at least
that a <= b or b <= a?

Then back to probabilities, it is rather nonstandard (and not with
regards to the standardization of a distribution's parameter) in
probability for a probability to not be within R_[0,1], with that the
sum or integral of the mass/density function over the support space is
one. (Bose/Fermi, parastatistics, anyonic)


Ross Finlayson

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.