In article <email@example.com>, WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 12 Mrz., 17:09, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mar 12, 5:00 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > > > > On 12 Mrz., 16:50, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > I say a lot of wrong things. But it > > > > does not matter much. Anything I > > > > say can easily be translated into > > > > something correct. > > > > > How would you translate your credo: The list contains more numbers > > > than fit into a single line? This sentence is completely foreign to > > > potential infinity. > > > > Let the potentially infinite sequence of > > numbers in the list be X. > > There is no findable line that is coFIS to (X). > > And perhaps you will show some such numbers, at least two, which do > not fit into one single line? > > Regards, WM
The set of even naturals do not fit in one such finite line if we note that given any even natural, there is another larger than it. And for every even number that WM claims is a last/largest one, others can find another yet later/larger.
WM has frequently claimed that a mapping from the set of all infinite binary sequences to the set of paths of a CIBT is a linear mapping. In order to show that such a mapping is a linear mapping, WM must first show that the set of all binary sequences is a vector space and that the set of paths of a CIBT is also a vector space, which he has not done and apparently cannot do, and then show that his mapping satisfies the linearity requirement that f(ax + by) = af(x) + bf(y), where a and b are arbitrary members of a field of scalars and x and y are f(x) and f(y) are vectors in suitable linear spaces.
By the way, WM, what are a, b, ax, by and ax+by when x and y are binary sequences?
If a = 1/3 and x is binary sequence, what is ax ? and if f(x) is a path in a CIBT, what is af(x)?
Until these and a few other issues are settled, WM will still have failed to justify his claim of a LINEAR mapping from the set (but not yet proved to be vector space) of binary sequences to the set (but not yet proved to be vector space) of paths ln a CIBT.
Just another of WM's many wild claims of what goes on in his WMytheology that he cannot back up. --