|
|
Re: I Bet $25 to your $1 (PayPal) That You Can’t P rove Naive Set Theory Inconsistent
Posted:
Mar 13, 2013 5:57 PM
|
|
On Mar 13, 4:09 am, Charlie-Boo <shymath...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 1. Tarski: Truth is not expressible. >
not(not(X))
X IS TRUE!
---------------
Really Charlie your CHARADES have gone on long enough!
YOU CANNOT SHOW US 1 SYSTEM THAT IS INCONSISTENT
by the terminology you are making up.
----------------
If you have no USE for the word INCONSISTENT (THEORY)
then say so, and we can stop wasting our time discussing set theory with you.
-------------
WAGER: I will paypal CHARLIE BOO $25
if he can prove ANY theory at all is inconsistent!
Herc -- www.BLoCKPROLOG.com
|
|