Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.
|
|
Virgil
Posts:
4,660
Registered:
1/6/11
|
|
Re: Cantor's absurdity, once again, why not?
Posted:
Mar 14, 2013 6:17 PM
|
|
In article
<bc40a766-c250-4652-8533-c5b8ebc12653@r8g2000vbj.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 14 Mrz., 21:45, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
> > On 3/14/2013 3:26 PM, Virgil wrote:
> >
> > > In article
> > > <9e11404e-5e55-4f63-bdfe-e2c416345...@o5g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>,
> > > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> >
> > >> I believe, and I hope, that a
> > >> future generation will laugh at this hocus pocus.
> >
> > > And go back to unsolving Zeno's paradoxes?
>
> there is not the least relation between Cantor and Zenon.
Both of them appear to be original thinkers of an ilk far beyond WM's
perpetual pettiness.
***********************************************************************
WM has frequently claimed that a mapping from the set of all infinite
binary sequences to the set of paths of a CIBT is a linear mapping.
In order to show that such a mapping is a linear mapping, WM must first
show that the set of all binary sequences is a vector space and that the
set of paths of a CIBT is also a vector space, which he has not done and
apparently cannot do, and then show that his mapping satisfies the
linearity requirement that
f(ax + by) = af(x) + bf(y),
where a and b are arbitrary members of a field of scalars and x and y
are f(x) and f(y) are vectors in suitable linear spaces.
By the way, WM, what are a, b, ax, by and ax+by when x and y are binary
sequences?
If a = 1/3 and x is binary sequence, what is ax ?
and if f(x) is a path in a CIBT, what is af(x)?
Until these and a few other issues are settled, WM will still have
failed to justify his claim of a LINEAR mapping from the set (but not
yet proved to be vector space) of binary sequences to the set (but not
yet proved to be vector space) of paths ln a CIBT.
Just another of WM's many wild claims of what goes on in his WMytheology
that he cannot back up.
--
|
|
|
|
