Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.
|
|
Virgil
Posts:
4,479
Registered:
1/6/11
|
|
Re: Cantor's absurdity, once again, why not?
Posted:
Mar 14, 2013 7:15 PM
|
|
In article
<0ede2fea-1221-47eb-b10e-5fc31255b4fb@a14g2000vbm.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 14 Mrz., 22:03, "Jesse F. Hughes" <je...@phiwumbda.org> wrote:
>
> > Let me ask you about this notion of falsifiability. I presume that
> > you'd agree that Fermat's theorem,
> >
> > (An > 2)NOT(E a,b,c)( a^n + b^n = c^n )
> >
> > is falsifiable, since if it is false, we can show that it is false by
> > producing n, a, b and c such that
> >
> > n > 2 and a^n + b^n = c^n .
> >
> > So that is a proper mathematical statement (or whatever), right?
>
> This is trivial enough for you to understand.
> Obviously it is above the horizon of many matheologians to understand
> that |R| > |N| bears a contradiction, since elements of a set must all
> be distinguishable, that means definable by finite words
One can often in the real world distinguish things without naming them,
but apparently not in Wolkenmuekenheim.
In Wolkenmuekenheim, if WM does not have a name for something he
apparently cannot distinguish it from anything else that he does have a
name for.
***********************************************************************
WM has frequently claimed that a mapping from the set of all infinite
binary sequences to the set of paths of a CIBT is a linear mapping.
In order to show that such a mapping is a linear mapping, WM must first
show that the set of all binary sequences is a vector space and that the
set of paths of a CIBT is also a vector space, which he has not done and
apparently cannot do, and then show that his mapping satisfies the
linearity requirement that
f(ax + by) = af(x) + bf(y),
where a and b are arbitrary members of a field of scalars and x and y
are f(x) and f(y) are vectors in suitable linear spaces.
By the way, WM, what are a, b, ax, by and ax+by when x and y are binary
sequences?
If a = 1/3 and x is binary sequence, what is ax ?
and if f(x) is a path in a CIBT, what is af(x)?
Until these and a few other issues are settled, WM will still have
failed to justify his claim of a LINEAR mapping from the set (but not
yet proved to be vector space) of binary sequences to the set (but not
yet proved to be vector space) of paths ln a CIBT.
Just another of WM's many wild claims of what goes on in his WMytheology
that he cannot back up.
.
--
|
|
|
|
