so literally correct are yousville; I scrolled 'at random' into the text by what's-his-or-her, and it's like ESP of your statement, being essentially clueless about zerodom (zeroness?)
what is the cannonical digital representation of base-one accoutning (prove by induction) ??
thus quoth: sham--EVEN THOUGH IT WORKS- it is philosophically absurd and endsin meaninglessness.It becomes a mystery-that needs to be solved- as towhy maths works in the practical world when it ends in meaninglessness
> There are probably > situations where your NyaN bases are > extremely useful. But, my ignorance of > computational environments precludes me > from seeing them.