Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum
»
Discussions
»
sci.math.*
»
sci.math
Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.
Topic:
Cantor's absurdity, once again, why not?
Replies:
77
Last Post:
Mar 19, 2013 11:02 PM




Re: Cantor's absurdity, once again, why not?
Posted:
Mar 14, 2013 9:51 PM


WM <mueckenh@rz.fhaugsburg.de> writes:
> On 14 Mrz., 22:03, "Jesse F. Hughes" <je...@phiwumbda.org> wrote: > >> Let me ask you about this notion of falsifiability. I presume that >> you'd agree that Fermat's theorem, >> >> (An > 2)NOT(E a,b,c)( a^n + b^n = c^n ) >> >> is falsifiable, since if it is false, we can show that it is false by >> producing n, a, b and c such that >> >> n > 2 and a^n + b^n = c^n . >> >> So that is a proper mathematical statement (or whatever), right? > > This is trivial enough for you to understand.
I'll pass on discussing this with you. I've had my fill of debating anything with you for a while.
Thanks nonetheless, I'm sure.
 Jesse F. Hughes
"Usenet is demonstrably dangerous. It needs to be regulated." James S. Harris, voice of reason and moderation



