Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.
|
|
|
|
Re: Cantor's absurdity, once again, why not?
Posted:
Mar 14, 2013 9:51 PM
|
|
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> writes:
> On 14 Mrz., 22:03, "Jesse F. Hughes" <je...@phiwumbda.org> wrote:
>
>> Let me ask you about this notion of falsifiability. I presume that
>> you'd agree that Fermat's theorem,
>>
>> (An > 2)NOT(E a,b,c)( a^n + b^n = c^n )
>>
>> is falsifiable, since if it is false, we can show that it is false by
>> producing n, a, b and c such that
>>
>> n > 2 and a^n + b^n = c^n .
>>
>> So that is a proper mathematical statement (or whatever), right?
>
> This is trivial enough for you to understand.
I'll pass on discussing this with you. I've had my fill of debating
anything with you for a while.
Thanks nonetheless, I'm sure.
--
Jesse F. Hughes
"Usenet is demonstrably dangerous. It needs to be regulated."
--James S. Harris, voice of reason and moderation
|
|
|
|
