In article <email@example.com>, William Hughes <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Mar 15, 8:34 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > > > Let's first prove that already two cannot be necessary by the fact > > that two always can be replaced by one of them without changing the > > contents. > > > This is true but the fact that the two lines are > necessary has nothing to do with their contents. Two lines > cannot be replaced by one of them without changing the number > of lines. > > Consider the case is potential infinity. > A set of lines, K, that has an unfindable last number > must contain at least two findable lines. > The fact that these two lines are necessary has > nothing to do with the contents of the lines.
How can a set of lines be made to HAVE an unfindable last line unless one can somehow FIND that allegedly unfindable last line?
Outside of WMytheology, it can't.
Which demonstrates the MYTHeology in W-MYTH-eology --