The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: NyaN fractions and partitioning of Naturals into other NyaN bases
then ternary.

Replies: 13   Last Post: Mar 16, 2013 5:36 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 1,448
Registered: 4/7/12
Re: NyaN fractions and partitioning of Naturals into other NyaN bases
then ternary.

Posted: Mar 16, 2013 4:31 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 16 mar, 03:38, William Elliot <> wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Mar 2013, JT wrote:
> > Is there name for fractions when partitioned into other bases then
> > decimal, in decimal base they are of course decimals but what do you
> > call them in binary, octal, hexa and so on?

> Binaries, octals, hexas.

> > Evidently transfer principle either did not understand how NyaN works
> > or mocking me and i have no clue as to why.
> > But below is fractions as written in NyaN bases it have some
> > aestatichal symmetry that 0 based bases lacks.

> > Binary 1=.2 ; 1/2=.1 ; 2/2=.2 ; 1/4=.(1)1 ; 2/4=. (1)2 ...
> NyaN is stupid, don't use it.
> .2 is not a binary number
> .1(1) and .1(2) are nonsense.
> 1/4 = .01 in binary.

You do understand that the numbers in paragraphs signifies preceding
empty digitplaces, they are unfortunatly unavoidable and one of the
reasons why fractions superior to partitioning into bases.
I start to question the peoples IQ here on sci.math.

You do see why 2/81=.(3)2 or?

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.