JT
Posts:
1,200
Registered:
4/7/12
|
|
Re: NyaN fractions and partitioning of Naturals into other NyaN bases
then ternary.
Posted:
Mar 16, 2013 4:31 AM
|
|
On 16 mar, 03:38, William Elliot <ma...@panix.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Mar 2013, JT wrote:
> > Is there name for fractions when partitioned into other bases then
> > decimal, in decimal base they are of course decimals but what do you
> > call them in binary, octal, hexa and so on?
>
> Binaries, octals, hexas.
>
> > Evidently transfer principle either did not understand how NyaN works
> > or mocking me and i have no clue as to why.
> > But below is fractions as written in NyaN bases it have some
> > aestatichal symmetry that 0 based bases lacks.
>
> > Binary 1=.2 ; 1/2=.1 ; 2/2=.2 ; 1/4=.(1)1 ; 2/4=. (1)2 ...
>
> NyaN is stupid, don't use it.
> .2 is not a binary number
> .1(1) and .1(2) are nonsense.
> 1/4 = .01 in binary.
You do understand that the numbers in paragraphs signifies preceding
empty digitplaces, they are unfortunatly unavoidable and one of the
reasons why fractions superior to partitioning into bases.
I start to question the peoples IQ here on sci.math.
You do see why 2/81=.(3)2 or?
|
|
