Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: NyaN fractions and partitioning of Naturals into other NyaN bases
then ternary.

Replies: 13   Last Post: Mar 16, 2013 5:36 AM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 JT Posts: 1,448 Registered: 4/7/12
Re: NyaN fractions and partitioning of Naturals into other NyaN bases
then ternary.

Posted: Mar 16, 2013 5:10 AM

On 16 mar, 09:31, JT <jonas.thornv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 16 mar, 03:38, William Elliot <ma...@panix.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

> > On Fri, 15 Mar 2013, JT wrote:
> > > Is there name for fractions when partitioned into other bases then
> > > decimal, in decimal base they are of course decimals but what do you
> > > call them in binary, octal, hexa and so on?

>
> > Binaries, octals, hexas.
>
> > > Evidently transfer principle either did not understand how NyaN works
> > > or mocking me and i have no clue as to why.
> > > But below is fractions as written in NyaN bases it have some
> > > aestatichal symmetry that 0 based bases lacks.

>
> > > Binary 1=.2 ; 1/2=.1 ; 2/2=.2 ; 1/4=.(1)1 ; 2/4=. (1)2 ...
>
> > NyaN is stupid, don't use it.
> > .2 is not a binary number
> > .1(1) and .1(2) are nonsense.
> > 1/4 = .01 in binary.

>
> You do understand that the numbers in paragraphs signifies preceding
> empty digitplaces, they are unfortunatly unavoidable and one of the
> reasons why fractions superior to partitioning into bases.
> I start to question the peoples IQ here on sci.math.
>
> You do see why 2/81=.(3)2  or?

Yes that was ternary...

Date Subject Author
3/15/13 JT
3/15/13 JT
3/15/13 JT
3/15/13 FredJeffries@gmail.com
3/16/13 fom
3/16/13 Virgil
3/16/13 fom
3/15/13 William Elliot
3/16/13 JT
3/16/13 JT
3/16/13 JT
3/16/13 JT
3/16/13 JT
3/16/13 JT