Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum
»
Discussions
»
sci.math.*
»
sci.math
Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.
Topic:
Cantor's absurdity, once again, why not?
Replies:
77
Last Post:
Mar 19, 2013 11:02 PM




Re: Cantor's absurdity, once again, why not?
Posted:
Mar 16, 2013 11:49 AM


On 16 Mrz., 15:42, FredJeffries <fredjeffr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 16, 3:06 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fhaugsburg.de> wrote: > > > > > A name is a finite sequence of letters that two or more persons have > > agreed upon to be used for a given object. This object may be material > > or immaterial. > > How typically chauvinistic of you.
Why? i did not say it must be an German name. > > So my granddaughter is not naming when she points to a dog and utters > a certain sound which no one can write down but we can mimic.
If at least one other person understands, then she is naming the dog. But material objects need not be named, Showing, pointing etc, is sufficient  contrary to immaterial objects like numbers. > > So Socrates never named anything. > > So most of the human beings who have ever lives never named anything.
You try delibertely to misunderstand. Is that why you have no arguments to defend matheology  that nonsense that you sell as mathematics?
Regards, WM



