Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.
|
|
Virgil
Posts:
4,483
Registered:
1/6/11
|
|
Re: Cantor's absurdity, once again, why not?
Posted:
Mar 16, 2013 5:31 PM
|
|
In article
<131116fe-7800-4339-8285-f54c32cb4473@h9g2000vbk.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 16 Mrz., 15:42, FredJeffries <fredjeffr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mar 16, 3:06 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > A name is a finite sequence of letters that two or more persons have
> > > agreed upon to be used for a given object. This object may be material
> > > or immaterial.
> >
> > How typically chauvinistic of you.
>
> Why? i did not say it must be an German name.
Your WMytheology is far more chauvinistic than your Germanness.
> >
> > So my granddaughter is not naming when she points to a dog and utters
> > a certain sound which no one can write down but we can mimic.
>
> If at least one other person understands, then she is naming the dog.
> But material objects need not be named, Showing, pointing etc, is
> sufficient - contrary to immaterial objects like numbers.
> >
> > So Socrates never named anything.
> >
> > So most of the human beings who have ever lives never named anything.
>
> You try delibertely to misunderstand.
WM makes it far too easy to misunderstand, if fact he is frequently
almost impossible not to misunderstand.
> Is that why you have no
> arguments to defend matheology - that nonsense that you sell as
> mathematics?
>
It is our mathematics, which you mislabel a something else, which
dominates in the current world of mathematics, and the sort which you
are perpetually purveying, but are too poor a mathematician to sell,
which is in the extreme minority.
***********************************************************************
WM has frequently claimed that a mapping from the set of all infinite
binary sequences to the set of paths of a CIBT is a linear mapping.
In order to show that such a mapping is a linear mapping, WM must first
show that the set of all binary sequences is a vector space and that the
set of paths of a CIBT is also a vector space, which he has not done and
apparently cannot do, and then show that his mapping satisfies the
linearity requirement that
f(ax + by) = af(x) + bf(y),
where a and b are arbitrary members of a field of scalars and x and y
are f(x) and f(y) are vectors in suitable linear spaces.
By the way, WM, what are a, b, ax, by and ax+by when x and y are binary
sequences?
If a = 1/3 and x is binary sequence, what is ax ?
and if f(x) is a path in a CIBT, what is af(x)?
Until these and a few other issues are settled, WM will still have
failed to justify his claim of a LINEAR mapping from the set (but not
yet proved to be vector space) of binary sequences to the set (but not
yet proved to be vector space) of paths ln a CIBT.
Just another of WM's many wild claims of what goes on in his WMytheology
that he cannot back up.
--
|
|
|
|
