On 17 Mrz., 08:18, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: > On 3/16/2013 4:37 PM, WM wrote: > > > On 16 Mrz., 21:19, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > > >>> In potential infinity there is no necessary line except the last one. > >>> We know that with certainty from induction. Every found and fixed line > >>> n cannot be necessary, because the next line contains it. > > >> AS soon as something is identifies as a natural or a FIS of the set of > >> naturals, it has a successor. It cannot be either a natural nor a FIS of > >> the naturals without a successor. at least by any standard definition of > >> naturals. > > > As soon as a second becomes presence, it has a successor. > > And what fantasy is this? > > The successor to the present has existential form but > has not yet happened. > > That is not the Kantian aprioriticity of time. > > That is not the Hegelian becoming of the present. > > It is the unfounded object of unjustifiable belief.
It is the well known and established natural way how time passes and how the system of human actions in time goes off.