On 3/17/2013 4:13 AM, WM wrote: > On 17 Mrz., 08:18, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: >> On 3/16/2013 4:37 PM, WM wrote: >> >>> On 16 Mrz., 21:19, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: >> >>>>> In potential infinity there is no necessary line except the last one. >>>>> We know that with certainty from induction. Every found and fixed line >>>>> n cannot be necessary, because the next line contains it. >> >>>> AS soon as something is identifies as a natural or a FIS of the set of >>>> naturals, it has a successor. It cannot be either a natural nor a FIS of >>>> the naturals without a successor. at least by any standard definition of >>>> naturals. >> >>> As soon as a second becomes presence, it has a successor. >> >> And what fantasy is this? >> >> The successor to the present has existential form but >> has not yet happened. >> >> That is not the Kantian aprioriticity of time. >> >> That is not the Hegelian becoming of the present. >> >> It is the unfounded object of unjustifiable belief. > > It is the well known and established natural way how time passes and > how the system of human actions in time goes off.
It is the unfounded object of unjustifiable belief.