Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Just another exposition of MK.
Replies: 10   Last Post: Mar 17, 2013 1:50 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Zaljohar@gmail.com

Posts: 2,665
Registered: 6/29/07
Re: Just another exposition of MK.
Posted: Mar 17, 2013 1:50 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Mar 17, 7:27 pm, Frederick Williams <freddywilli...@btinternet.com>
wrote:
> Zuhair wrote:
>

> > On Mar 16, 9:33 am, Zuhair <zaljo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Define: Set(x) iff {x,..}
>
> > Define: Set(X) iff {X,..} exists.
>
> Does this mean that X is a set iff it is an element of something?
>
> --
> When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by
> this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him.
> Jonathan Swift: Thoughts on Various Subjects, Moral and Diverting


Yes, all terms range over CLASSES. So the above means

Any class X is a set iff it is an element of some class.



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.