Virgil
Posts:
8,833
Registered:
1/6/11


Re: ZFC is inconsistent
Posted:
Mar 17, 2013 3:31 PM


In article <f653d28e43994a08bded0273190b186d@he10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>, WM <mueckenh@rz.fhaugsburg.de> wrote:
> On 17 Mrz., 10:54, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: > > On 3/16/2013 4:57 PM, WM wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 16 Mrz., 16:13, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: > > > > >> Where we come to the question of > > >> how you refer to points without > > >> an implicit use of infinity. > > > > > All points that you can define geometrically, belong to a finite > > > collection. > > > > >> This, of course, comes back to > > >> how you refer singularly without > > >> an implicit use of infinity. > > > > > A unit can be defined without referring to infinity. I think it is one > > > of the silliest arguments of matheology that infinity is required to > > > define finity. It is simply insane. > > > > No. It is merely respectful  something of > > which you seem incapable. > > > Respect requires a respectable object. > Insanities do not deserve respect. > There were too many who respected Nero, Napoleon, Hitler or Stalin and > those who stimulated others to do so.
There is also at least one too many who respect WM, namely WM.
######################################################################
WM has frequently claimed that HIS mapping from the set of all infinite binary sequences to the set of paths of a CIBT is a linear mapping.
In order to show that such a mapping is a linear mapping, WM would first have to show that the set of all binary sequences is a linear space (which he has not done and apparently cannot do) and that the set of paths of a CIBT is also a vector space (which he also has not done and apparently cannot do) and then show that his mapping, say f, satisfies the linearity requirement that f(ax + by) = af(x) + bf(y), where a and b are arbitrary members of the field of scalars and x and y and f(x) and f(y) are arbitrary members of suitable linear spaces.
While this is possible, and fairly trivial for a competent mathematician to do, WM has not yet been able to do it.
But frequently claims already to have done it. 

