On 3/18/2013 5:22 PM, WM wrote: > > It is an impudence to write so much nonsense that has not the least > relation to the topic and to expect that I read it. Unfortunately I > did it, but it was the last time. > > In future, please express yourself concise and to the point in few > words, if you would like to be read.
You are making claims concerning the nature of names in mathematics.
Your ignorance of the pertinent history of that topic is demonstrated by your response.
I do not care if you read my posts.
It is clear that you are not reading the majority of them since very few of your responses are to points made deeper into the posts.
I am, however, concerned that your readers get a balanced view of what is actually involved in the analysis of your remarks, and, that they become aware of the hard work of others that you recklessly disparage.
If they have the patience, they may learn something they did not know -- even if they disagree.