In <email@example.com>, on 03/18/2013 at 12:55 AM, Kaba <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
>Possibly, but whether it's a good idea I disagree on. In general, >a book should not expect or ask anything "extra" from the reader. It >might be that developing your own proofs is the best way to learn, >but people have different amounts of time to invest on given >topic. I wished a given book maximized the benefit of reading >that book.
A book that wasted a large amount of space explaining the obvious would not maximize the benefit of reading it.
>Whoever reads this post can measure the time on how long it takes >to understand Lang's underlying logic here. I myself am unable to >decode the last two rows of the proof, which should be the core >of the proof.
Unsolicited bulk E-mail subject to legal action. I reserve the right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail. Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do not reply to email@example.com