On Mar 19, 8:49 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > On 19 Mrz., 00:44, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > Do you agree with the statement.
If a set of lines contains an unfindable line then it contains two findable lines.
> > > > But the more pressing question is: You construct a list such that > > > every line contains all preceding contents. You get ready, i.e., the > > > list contains all that it can contain. Nevertheless there is no line > > > that contains everything that the list contains. > > > Yep, no last line. > > Do you recognize that this is no explanation for your assertion that > in our list more than one line contain more than one line contains? >
Nope. Clearly only the last line contains everything in the list. If there is no last line, then no line contains everything in the list.
Note that lines are needed for other reasons than just their contents. So your proof that any two lines can be replaced by one line without changing the contents is irrelevant.