On 19 Mrz., 17:34, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: > On 3/19/2013 11:28 AM, WM wrote: > > > > > > > On 18 Mrz., 23:50, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: > > >>> If you are unable to prove by yourself that the set of finite words is > >>> countable, then further discussion with you is meaningless. > > >> What I can or cannot prove to myself is not > >> an issue. > > > Exactly that is the issue - and nothing else! > > >> What is needed here is an agreed upon standard > >> of proof. > > > You think if there are enough fools to agree on a foolish standard, > > that would be enough? You think if there are enough fools to assert > > that countably many words are sufficient to label uncountably many > > words, that must be true? > > > Deplorable slave! > > It seems that I have graduated from > being a parrot. > > I am now acknowledged as a human > being.