In article <email@example.com>, WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 19 Mrz., 09:40, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: > > On 3/18/2013 10:45 AM, WM wrote: > > > > > On 18 Mrz., 13:50, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >> So you take a set of lines that contains an unfindable line > > >> remove all the findable lines and end up with a set > > >> that contains an unfindable line, but no findable line ?!? > > > > > If you remove every findable line, there cannot remain a findable > > > line, can it? > > > > Why don't you try *answering* what was asked. > > Because this question will become interesting only after settling the > present issue.
Or because giving an answer will reveal the flaws in WM's position. Like the flaws in his non-linear "linear" mapping from the binary sequences via the reals to to the paths.
Note that different binary sequences representing the same binary rational become one real so can only map to one path, not the two paths claimed. --