In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, WM <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 18 Mrz., 23:52, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: > > On 3/18/2013 5:11 PM, WM wrote: > > > > > > > > > Either you know that, or you don't. If not, then it is not my task to > > > teach you. > > > > You disappoint. > > > > You have often -- and explicitly -- stated that > > you have come here to teach me. > > Did I??? I had come to you? Not as fas as I know. > Nevertheless: Sometimes even I have to confess that I have failed.
It is very difficult to teach things to those who know more that you do, particularly when they also know that some of what you claim to know is wrong.
WM claims to know how to map bijectively the set of infinite binary sequences, B, linearly into the set of reals and then map that image linearly ONTO the set of all paths, P, of a Complete Infinite Binary Tree.
But each binary rational in |R is necessarily the image of two sequences in B but that one rational can then only produce one image in P, so the mapping cannot be the bijection WM claims.
SO that WM is, as usual with things mathematical, wrong. --