On 20 Mrz., 17:42, YBM <ybm...@nooos.fr.invalid> wrote: > Le 20/03/2013 17:35, WM a écrit : > > > On 20 Mrz., 17:18, YBM <ybm...@nooos.fr.invalid> wrote: > >> Proof, in the Mückenheim way, that an dog with no legs has two legs. > > > It is a pity that you have no idea of what set-inclusion means. But I > > am not surprised. > > The pity is that you do not recognize you OWN way of "prooving" > statement when you are in face of it.
I did it my way. I'll state my case of which I'm certain.
But if you have any remarks apart from silly dys-analogies, you are invited to try to write mathematics.