In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, WM <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 20 Mrz., 17:42, YBM <ybm...@nooos.fr.invalid> wrote: > > Le 20/03/2013 17:35, WM a écrit : > > > > > On 20 Mrz., 17:18, YBM <ybm...@nooos.fr.invalid> wrote: > > >> Proof, in the Mückenheim way, that an dog with no legs has two legs. > > > > > It is a pity that you have no idea of what set-inclusion means. But I > > > am not surprised. > > > > The pity is that you do not recognize you OWN way of "prooving" > > statement when you are in face of it. > > I did it my way. > I'll state my case of which I'm certain. > > But if you have any remarks apart from silly dys-analogies, you are > invited to try to write mathematics.
Writing mathematics, other than in copying or paraphrasing the work of others, is clearly beyond WM's demonstrated capacities. --