On 3/20/2013 11:42 AM, YBM wrote: > Le 20/03/2013 17:35, WM a écrit : >> On 20 Mrz., 17:18, YBM <ybm...@nooos.fr.invalid> wrote: >>> Proof, in the Mückenheim way, that an dog with no legs has two legs. >> >> It is a pity that you have no idea of what set-inclusion means. But I >> am not surprised. > > The pity is that you do not recognize you OWN way of "prooving" > statement when you are in face of it. >
"Proof by reality" is not based upon even his own methods.