> On 20 Mrz., 22:11, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mar 20, 10:01 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: >> >> > It cannot contain a necessary line, since, as you said, there is no >> > necessary line. >> > But you think that it necessarily must contain a not necessary line. >> >> Correct. However, this not necessary line can be any line. >> >> > If so, then at least one line is necessary. >> >> No, knowing that you need one line does not mean you need >> one particular line. > > You cannot know that you need one line, because every chice can be > disproved. >> >> <snip> >> >> > > A set of needed lines exists. >> >> > Name the first line. >> >> One set of needed lines that exists is line 2,3,4,6,7,8... >> The first line is 2. > > This set is not a set of needed lines, because 2, 3, and all lines you > mentioned are not needed lines. > > Would you call the set 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/5, ... a set of natural > numbers? > > Do you get a faint idea meanwhile, what actual infinity implies?
It certainly implies that you are an idiot. But that is not our problem.