The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 224
Replies: 1   Last Post: Mar 21, 2013 6:00 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View  
Alan Smaill

Posts: 1,103
Registered: 1/29/05
Re: Matheology § 224
Posted: Mar 21, 2013 6:00 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

WM <> writes:

> On 21 Mrz., 02:02, fom <> wrote:
>> On 3/20/2013 4:07 PM, WM wrote:

>> > On 20 Mrz., 22:01, fom <> wrote:
>> >> Indeed, you have not even given an explanation
>> >> of *all* that is agreed upon.

>> > If you don't know the set theoretic meaning of "all natural numbers",
>> > then you should try to learn it. If you don't know the meaning of
>> > Cantor's "wohlunterscheidbar" (well-distinguishable) that has to be
>> > true for all elements of every set, then you should try to learn it.

>> You should learn what is required when you
>> make claims in academic discourse.

> And you should be glad to have left academics.

And you should be ashamed to disparage someone who
is thinking for himself.

> Regards, WM

Alan Smaill

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.