Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.



Re: Matheology § 224
Posted:
Mar 21, 2013 6:00 AM


WM <mueckenh@rz.fhaugsburg.de> writes:
> On 21 Mrz., 02:02, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: >> On 3/20/2013 4:07 PM, WM wrote: >> >> > On 20 Mrz., 22:01, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: >> >> >> Indeed, you have not even given an explanation >> >> of *all* that is agreed upon. >> >> > If you don't know the set theoretic meaning of "all natural numbers", >> > then you should try to learn it. If you don't know the meaning of >> > Cantor's "wohlunterscheidbar" (welldistinguishable) that has to be >> > true for all elements of every set, then you should try to learn it. >> >> You should learn what is required when you >> make claims in academic discourse. > > And you should be glad to have left academics.
And you should be ashamed to disparage someone who is thinking for himself.
> Regards, WM
 Alan Smaill



