"fom" <fomJUNK@nyms.net> wrote in message news:1ZudnajAj7TF09fMnZ2dnUVZ_vydnZ2d@giganews.com... > On 3/20/2013 4:36 PM, AMeiwes wrote: >> "fom" <fomJUNK@nyms.net> wrote in message >> news:wIydnYEnbJNc-dTMnZ2dnUVZ_sqdnZ2d@giganews.com... >>> >>> In the post, >>> >>> news://news.giganews.com:firstname.lastname@example.org >>> >>> WM has made the remarks, >>> >>> "This is deplorable because mathematic >>> like no other part of "arts"depends on >>> physics." >> >> wrong => math is not art. physics depends on math. >> > > In fairness, the reference to "art" here involves the > distinction between the convocation of Masters of Arts > degrees and Masters of Science degrees in the system > of higher education. That, however, is irrelevant to > what is meant in relation to the relative logical > priority between mathematics and physics. >
..... so what does "relevant relative logical priority" actually mean?
>> >>> "Reality is the ultimate arbiter since >>> mathematics has been abstracted from >>> reality." >> >> circular thinking since one is thinking in circles. >> > > I, personally, have no problem with circularity. > At issue, however, is the correctness of its application, > and "thinking in circles" is disqualified. >
if disqualification leads to disagreement, I agree