On Mar 21, 2:11 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > On 21 Mrz., 14:02, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > In fact? That's amazing. So we cannot prove that all lines of the > > > infinite set of lines are unnecessary? > > > We can prove that something is true for every > > member of an infinite set. We cannot > > prove that something is true for the set > > itself unless the set is finite. > > But I am not interested in the set itself. Not at all! My claim is > that every member of the set of lines can be removed
Yes, removed one at a time
>such that no member remains
nope, working one at a time you will not get to the point that no member remains.