On 3/21/2013 8:11 AM, WM wrote: > > But I am not interested in the set itself. Not at all! My claim is > that every member of the set of lines can be removed such that no > member remains, but every natural number is contained in the list. >
It would be difficult to find WM making a better statement of his presumption of completed infinities.
One has the empty list.
One has every natural number.
WM confuses "natural number" with "representation of natural number" and his intentions to make such representations.
Keep that in mind when he tries to say that I have misrepresented what people generally intend with the use of the word "every".