On 3/22/2013 1:45 AM, WM wrote: > On 21 Mrz., 19:39, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: >> On 3/21/2013 6:32 AM, WM wrote: >> >> >> >>> Note: For every finite set of natural numbers, we can look at all >>> elements, at least in principle. >> >> Would you care to prove this for your readers? > > No, since it is wrong (at least if sets are considered which have more > that 10^100 elements). But it is the position of set theory which I do > apply here in oder to contradict it.
Since your statement implies that you actually *know* how to use standard set theory, then you will not hesitate to provide a *proof* within set theory according to the established means that shows it to be inconsistent.
That is your claim.
Now you claim to know the techniques for proving it.