On 22 Mrz., 09:14, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: > On 3/22/2013 1:55 AM, WM wrote: > > > > > > > On 21 Mrz., 20:35, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: > >> On 3/21/2013 10:11 AM, WM wrote: > > >>> Induction does not need time. > > >> In > > >> news://news.giganews.com:119/f23c81fd-2463-4d3f-8df4-04799a493...@z4g2000vbz.googlegroups.com > > >> WM wrote: > > >> ================ > >> Everything that is in the list > >> 1 > >> 1, 2 > >> 1, 2, 3 > >> ... > >> 1, 2, 3, ..., n > >> is in the last line. Alas as soon as you try to fix it, it is no > >> longer the last line. > > > The former is the position of set theory, the latter is the correct > > way of thinking - useful for those who can think. > > If you believe that to be the case, > why will you not explain the details?
Because every intelligent reader has already got it.