> On 20 Mrz., 22:32, Ralf Bader <ba...@nefkom.net> wrote: >> WM wrote: >> > On 20 Mrz., 22:11, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> > > A set of needed lines exists. >> >> >> > Name the first line. >> >> >> One set of needed lines that exists is line 2,3,4,6,7,8... >> >> The first line is 2. >> >> > This set is not a set of needed lines, because 2, 3, and all lines you >> > mentioned are not needed lines. >> >> > Would you call the set 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/5, ... a set of natural >> > numbers? >> >> > Do you get a faint idea meanwhile, what actual infinity implies? >> >> It certainly implies that you are an idiot. But that is not our problem. > > I know that there are always interesting arguments to be expected from > your side. But in case you would not spurn to sink to the depth of > boring simple mathematics, perhaps you have an idea to explain why > line number 2 belongs to William's set, given above, of needed lines > as the first one. > > Regards, WM
I am really sorry, but I am definitely not interested in braindead discussions about "needed lines".