In article <email@example.com>, WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 22 Mrz., 08:30, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > No your proof shows that *any* *one* line > > including all its predecessors > > > can be removed from the > > list. > > However, you are talking about removing more > > than one line, i,e. a *set* of lines. > > Singletons are subject to induction. > Take the union of all singletons that are subject to my proof. > If something remained, what could that be?
So that WM claims that when nothing remains he still has evereything?