In article <email@example.com>, WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 22 Mrz., 20:34, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > > > > > Singletons are subject to induction. > > > Take the union of all singletons that are subject to my proof. > > > If something remained, what could that be? > > > > So that WM claims that when nothing remains he still has everything? > > If actual infinity is true, then this would be the case. Not outside WMytheology!
> Now try to > figure out what follows from (A ==> B) & ~B.
If "(A ==> B) & ~B" takes place in the logic of WMytheology, anything may follow from it, depending on WM's whim of he moment.
But WM cannot expect answers to his questions, even such simple ones, when he steadfastly refuses to answer our far more relevant ones.. --