> The only reason you may speak of a "proof" is > because of the extreme patience that WH has > spent trying to find anything that approximates > rational discourse among your statements.
No WH said, that the proof is correct. And every other mathematician, to whom I have shown this proof, has recognized it as such. It seems your intellect must be blamed to be too narrow to recognize the proof. Perhaps the reason is that you are not a mathematicain?